Skip to content

Criteria for the Virtual Office

More and more vendors are introducing Cloud platforms and SaaS offerings to bring people together online. The purpose of these collaborative systems is to mimic the work environment that we had since the first organized office.

Generic OfficeThink about the work environment people have been using since the organized office became commonplace. We see it best in old movies now – each department on a different floor, rows of secretaries sitting at IBM Selectrics, junior executives in cubicles, seniors in offices. In my earlier days at AT&T, we were constantly rearranging people so that all members of national account teams sat next to each other and we hung signs from the ceiling. Meetings were held at a moment’s notice, and to share a document, I just plopped a file folder on a colleague’s desk.

Today the work environment has changed dramatically. More people work remotely from home. We have virtual teams, more consultants and outsourced staffing. Rising gas prices and economic situations will make the virtual office even more of a necessity.

Everyone has a different description of the virtual office. I have been running virtual companies since the 1980s. I remember being thrilled to More…have an MCI email account and realized that I didn’t have to deal with voice mail to communicate with people. Since then I’ve had a lot of experience with what works and what doesn’t. The company that wins in this market will be one that develops products that master a few vital basics and limits the superfluous bells and whistles.

Simplicity and Familiarity
People naturally resist (some say hate) change. The interface has to resemble what people are very familiar with and be as intuitive as possible. This may sound basic, but if you look at the dozen or so players in the collaboration space right now, only a few have done this very well. Others are so functionally foreign and difficult to use that you quickly give up after a few tries at figuring out just the basics. To cross the chasm and become dominant in the market, the user experience has to be familiar and simple.

Presence / Chat
I feel this is the most important aspect. Knowing the status of everyone you are working with is the cornerstone of a successful system. In the older conventional office model we could glance across the room or lean over the cubicle wall to chat about the weather or a new product release. The alternative today is instant chat or phone conferencing. Services like VOIP or Free Conference services have made ad hoc conferences fast and easy to set up.

File Control/ Sharing and Real-time Collaboration
At the heart of business today are documents and files. They are both a work product and a work process. With the exponential increase in consultants, outsourcing, and partner communities, the ability to apply meaningful levels of document authority is one of today’s crucial imperatives. Add a detailed audit trail for security, control, convenience and forensics and you have the ingredients of a viable document and file management system. Real-time collaboration and push technology automates most of these management tasks. In combination, these management tools make obsolete – and eliminate – the need for Email attachments.

Early on I mentioned people’s resistance to change. There are many potentially powerful solutions on the market for document control, file backup and collaboration. The challenge they all face is delivering on ease of use and minimizing the need for change in behavior. For mass adoption, you must mimic the way people work today and automate as many functions as possible.

Conferencing
Conferencing is a broad category – I tend to think about it in buckets. Show and tell events are scheduled sessions that have a designated presenter and a group audience. There are a number of products on the market now that handle this very well with different pricing models and levels of feature/functionality. I believe that Ad Hoc sharing is one of the most usable features in the collaboration world. The ability to instantly share a screen or work product with no setup is as close as we’ll get to “leaning over the cubical wall”. There are two ways to do this: (1) products that allow for instant screen sharing (usually on a one-to-one basis), or (2) products that provide real-time document sharing and updating among multiple users. I use both extensively and find them invaluable in the “Virtual Office”

Change
Every generation entering the workplace brings different skill sets and biases. The first real software company I worked for had a home-grown mainframe email system. The CFO would have his admin print hard copies of his emails. He would hand write the responses, and she had to be the one to key in his message and send the reply email.

As ridiculous as that sounds now, in a decade or so, the idea that we kept applications and files on our local PC will sound just a ludicrous. In the meantime we need a hybrid solution to accommodate the work force and its work habits. Accelerate the use of the cloud for applications and data, but give people the option of working from their desktop. By making online work easier and more convenient, the traditional desktop will become as functional as your Tonsils, still there but not needed.

2 Responses to “Criteria for the Virtual Office”

How do you combine activities at the virtual office with the physical office? How could you integrate both offices into a whole system of business?

Really like this post on Criteria for the Virtual Office.

Respond